Article
Archives

GAY MARRIAGE ?

     Let me see if I understand this correctly. My trusty 1965 Britannica World Language Dictionary defines gay as an adjective meaning filled with or inspiring mirth; merry; sportive. It also defines marriage as a noun meaning a compact entered into by a man and a woman, to live together as husband and wife; wedlock.

   Whew, now that we have the difficult part out of the way, it becomes obvious that there is no reason for discussion. So, what we are really talking about here are lustful sodomites who in their effort to escape human judgement have embraced yankee inspired secular humanism and all its empty philosophical baggage. But what breaks my heart and causes me to fear for the future of my community is that our present popular culture even with its attendant evils is not solely to blame. There are serious journalists presumably dedicated to the dissemination of legitimate news who use the maleducated (the prefix mal meaning defective or evil) term for sodomite unions. There are black robed oracles called judges in our culture who even divine that our constitution condones sodomite debauchery. There are so-called men of the cloth who not only embrace sodomite filth but who admit to its practice and it is they who are paraded about by the serious journalists. There are our elected representatives who being ever skillful at political pandering must debate the merits of the issue and thus give the sordid affair legitimacy. There are so-called conservative spokespersons that continually advance the issue using the term but only in fair and open-minded debate. There are sincere hard working folk who use the term and say, "What has become of our country?" Even our highest elected leader suggests the rest of us folk must do the heavy lifting and rally around an unneeded constitutional amendment to correct a perfectly understandable document from the likes of maleducated sodomites and black robed oracles.

     What saddens me is that outside of a very few fundamental churches most of this once great land is engaged in a debate that not too long ago would not have existed simply because of the definition of the terms. How can a serious, educated, Christian Nation, dedicated to its posterity, condone such behavior?

     The answer is simple provided your mind is not too trivially preoccupied. The political panderers won the struggle that ended in 1865 for the soul of this nation. At that time our Constitutional Republic was hijacked by a lustful, greedy, arrogant class of yankee, the likes of whom have made life miserable for the rest of us ever since. They introduced the concept of victimhood and removed the restraints of personal responsibility. Their brand of humanism mixed with every filthy philosophical cult from the slums of Europe slowly infected churches and communities of New England, then other northern cities, and finally the whole country. Their arrogance and greed have given us wars, depressions and cultural decay. Today, our duly elected representatives and our appointed black robed oracles have determined that human sacrifice of the unborn is legal while God’s Ten Commandments are not. The God of the Bible, modesty and virtue are mocked while vile depravity, lust, and other gods are worshipped and admired.

     Before the invasion of the sovereign Southern states in 1861, Letitia M. Burwell a Virginia girl kept a diary that was subsequently published in 1895 as A Girl’s Life in Virginia Before the War. After a visit to New York City she remarked "Where the whole energy of a people is applied to making money, the souls of men become dwarfed." I want you to read that quote again. The arrogant folk who reduced our Republic to rubble and upon it built their Tower of Babble may have captured the ‘National Soul’ but after 140 years of their stewardship the soul they lusted after is now dwarfed and we are no longer a Christian Nation. Rather than me recounting the list of abominations attendant to these United States I would ask you to explain how a Christian people can condone the few items I mentioned in the above paragraph. A Christian Nation would simply have said ‘NO’, get thee behind me Satan.

     To my way of thinking a Christian is one who has professed his faith in the Living God, Jesus Christ. The Jesus who was born of a virgin, suffered our penalty on the Cross, died and was buried and was raised on the third day, and lives forever more. Now if you attend Church once in a while and try to be good and consider yourself a Christian, you’re not. If you come from a good family and help at the soup kitchen, that does not make you a Christian. Repeating a wrote prayer, being a Deacon, living a good life and doing good works does not make you a Christian. Don’t take my word for it read a King James Bible. In The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Romans, 3:23 it states, "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God." Then 6:23, "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." And 10:9, "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." And finally in the Gospel According to Saint John, Chapter 3 Verse 18, "He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."

     I don’t mean to be a stick in the mud to all you well meaning feel-good-about-yourself folk but I look and search and find no evidence that ours is a Christian Nation. Where is the outrage of having been lied to? Where is the anger over human sacrifice? Where are the calls to close down government indoctrination centers called schools that not only do not educate but maleducate? Where is the demand to abolish the usurious tax and banking system? Where are the petitions to impeach foul judges? Where are the calls to keep God and His Ten Commandments in public places and Holidays? Where is the political leader who is a servant? Where is the politician who leaves his office of service with less wealth than when he entered? The answer is there are none. Most recently a great debate swirls around the movie The Passion of the Christ because some claim it is anti-Semitic. Why debate? Hasn’t anyone read the Book! In The Acts of the Apostles Chapter 5 we find Peter and other apostles persecuted by a high priest of a sect of the Sadducees and in verses 29 and 30 states, "Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, we ought to obey God rather than men. The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree." That’s not anti-Semitic, that’s the truth.

     In the 17^th Century, Lord Woodhouselee made this observation, "A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury...a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by dictatorship. The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations has been 200 years." By the way, ours began sometime after 1861; you can do the math. An 18^th Century Virginia gentleman, Confederate General Richard Taylor, son of President Zachary Taylor said, " Greed of office, curse of democracies, will impel demagogues to grovel deeper and deeper in the mire in pursuit of ignorant votes." Can you honestly tell me with a straight face that the parasites and demagogues are not in control? Where is the Christian call for order?

     The Soldiers Training Manual, TM2000-25: 120-121, U.S. War Department dated November 30, 1928 gives the following definitions:

     REPUBLIC: Authority is derived throughout with election by the people of public officials to represent them. Attitude for property is respect for laws and individual rights. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. Avoids the dangerous extremes of either tyranny or mobocracy.

    DEMOCRACY: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy."

     Our Founders were very aware of the dangers of Democracy and often referred to it as Mobocracy, which is why we were given the system we were originally given. Four men and a woman find themselves lost and three men agree to have their way with the woman. That is democracy at work but democracy doesn’t make it right. If our Founders and men like Patrick Henry and John C. Calhoun knew of the dangers you can be sure those seeking power and wealth knew also. And they finally had their way in 1860.

     If you think about it there are only three types of conquests of peoples. Generally it encompasses more than one of the three but not always. There is:

Military Conquest which requires large standing armies.

Religious or Ideal Conquest which spreads through a people giving common bond.

Economic Conquest which creates an illusion of freedom while causing servitude.

George Washington, a great Virginian, commander of our first independence struggle, and first President warned often to avoid foreign entanglements. Unfortunately after the mid 19^th Century his advise was ignored. Today according to the Base Structure Report of the Department of Defense we are located in 135 countries which represents 70% of the World’s countries. This does not include Territories or Possessions. Since the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Union evaporated why would we be required to ground so many troops to so many countries? We are told by the credible information disseminators that it is either economic interest or the preservation or establishment of democracy. Huh! Neither sounds credible to me. Rather we should be told the truth which is that the international banking cabal that in reality controls this country is about economic Empire and a one world order. Evil’s masquerade has been successful.

     Article 1 Section 8 of The Constitution of the United States of America among other enumerations states, "The Congress shall have power to coin Money and regulate the value thereof." Then tell me please how the Federal Reserve Act got passed in December of 1913 when many Congressmen were away for Christmas holidays? How is it that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation? How is it that the books of the Federal Reserve have never been audited by the United States Government? How is it that the Congress by legislation can nullify the Constitution?

     President Woodrow Wilson said, "A great industrial Nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the Nation and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world…no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." (Just before he died, Wilson is reported to have stated to his friends that he had been "deceived" and that "I have betrayed my Country." He referred to the Federal Reserve Act passed during his Presidency. Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920’s and second richest man in Britain at that time said, "Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." Mr. Lewis T. McFadden, a Representative from Pennsylvania and Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency said into the record on June 10, 1932, "The Federal Reserve Banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this Nation is run by the International Bankers…Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States government’s institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers." Even the Russian Tolstoy recognized in 1891, that "Money is a new form of slavery, and distinguishable from the old simply by the fact that it is impersonal…that there is no human relation between master and slave."

     If you’re wondering what all this has to do with sodomites feeling good about themselves, please bear with me a little longer. It has been said that all cultural changes are preceded by theological changes. In 1860 the bonds that bound this Nation in Christian harmony were torn asunder and replaced with bayonets, terror, and yankee humanism guided by the principles of force, greed, selfishness, ambition and pleasure. That opened the gates wide to demagogues, thieves, and parasites, which lead to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. That in effect led to WWI without which there would have been no WWII. Now who do you suppose were behind both? Yep, international bankers. And poor Tsar Nicholas wouldn’t turn his country’s currency over to the international bankers so he and his family were murdered by a Bolshevik Revolution. Who do you suppose were behind that revolution? Yep, international bankers. And where on the entire globe are national currencies not in the hands of and not in direct control by the international bankers? Yep, many of the Arab Countries of the Middle East. Additionally, many Middle Eastern oil producers have been desirous of switching their export oil accounts from Dollars to Euros, particularly Iraq which switched in early 2003. So, while we are busy forcing mobocracy upon a whole people who do not wish it we are also enabling Economic Empire building. The writer Francis W. Springer said it best, "War is not caused by hatred. It is the other way around. Hatred is manufactured, like munitions, as a necessary instrume